The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system
The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system
Blog Article
refers into a landmark case decided from the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Below’s a brief overview:
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a effectively-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of one day from the registration of FIR which has not been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of the alleged event along with the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to become the real brothers with the deceased but they did not react in any respect to your confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on so many occasions that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak style of evidence which might be manoeuvred with the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution can be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to existence of some light at the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other on a motorcycle at four.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed within the bank and due to the fact only the appellants were posted in the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
R.O, Office, Gujranwala along with the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade on the accused hasn't been conducted nevertheless. In the instant case, now the accused tried to take advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture with the petitioner was broadly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity in the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly for the witness to establish the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and created pictures. Other than, the images shown about the media reveal that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to hide his identity till he was set up for an identification parade. Making pictures in the accused publically, either by showing the same to the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or software, would create doubt while in the proceedings from the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be certain that there isn't any opportunity for the witness to begin to see the accused before going on the identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the push or electronic media. Given the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Petitioner getting been declared an absconder in check here this case for over one as well as a 50 percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner might avoid standing trial and as a result delay the prosecution with the case. The material on record makes the case in the petitioner falls under two exceptions to the rule of grant of bail as mentioned earlier mentioned.
Extra username and password are demanded for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
after release from the prison he shed interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected towards the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.
Doing a case legislation search could be as easy as coming into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, together with:
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only performed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are set up by executive agencies based on statutes.